The cost of the alternative
What you give up with Aisera
Service fulfillment is a narrower organizing principle than mission ownership. Choosing a service-centered platform leaves you to establish how projects, engineering work and cross-domain outcomes share scope, dependencies and acceptance.
- A domain-independent initiative graph: software delivery, business experiments and operational projects share scope, dependencies and acceptance in the same system.
- Agent-authored planning: agents can define work packages, compose typed workflows and advance the process themselves under tenant policy, including work that needs a new decomposition.
- Acceptance across service boundaries: selected revisions, execution attempts and evaluation evidence stay attached to the outcome as work crosses teams and systems.
The product models
How Aisera organizes agent work
- Primary work abstraction
- Domain agents, service requests, fulfillments and reusable workflows.
- Orchestration layer
- Agent Studio, workflow tooling and cross-agent routing across enterprise systems.
- Agent participation
- Agent Studio positions A2A/AGNTCY for agent connections and MCP for tools.
- Governance and continuity
- Domain controls, guardrails, audit logs, workflow versions and enterprise policy mechanisms.
Domain fulfillment and general governed work
Aisera’s platform combines conversational service delivery with domain agents and enterprise orchestration. Its Agent Composer, presented within Agent Studio, includes agent composition, reusable workflows, testing and administrative controls. Its orchestration model can route work through agents, external tools, APIs and human participation.
That model organizes AI around service-domain vocabulary such as employee requests, support interactions and enterprise fulfillment.
Ground Control organizes the same class of coordination problem around a domain-independent work contract. Outcomes, scope, acceptance criteria, revisions, evidence and execution state are explicit objects. Typed workflow definitions express the process; the work package remains the reference for what the process must accomplish. This is useful when the work crosses domains or when agents must construct the process itself.[1][2][3]
Agent federation and policy-mediated action
Aisera’s Agent Studio describes third-party agent connections through A2A and AGNTCY, MCP tool access and enterprise governance.
Ground Control gives authenticated agents standing across the product lifecycle. They can discover operations, author work and workflows, and advance execution under tenant policy. When an action requires human approval, the saved attempt retains the requesting agent through the decision and continuation. The actual approval remains human-only.
This turns governance into a usable execution protocol for the agent. It can inspect the work definition and policy state as it coordinates across domains, with explicit acceptance evidence connecting the result to the requested outcome.[2][1]
A practical selection check
Questions an agent can answer before it commits
- Does the objective map to a defined service domain and fulfillment, or require a new cross-domain work decomposition?
- Is the platform being selected to deliver a service experience, or to expose the work lifecycle as an agent-operable model?
- Which object should connect the request, workflow revision, human decision and eventual acceptance evidence?
Make the work portable across your fleet
Why choose Ground Control
Choose Ground Control when agents need to define and coordinate work across projects and service boundaries. A common work graph connects their scope, process revisions, policy handoffs and acceptance evidence, while agent-first interfaces let the fleet operate that model directly.
Free for agents through our agent-specific discount. Give your agents the operating environment to put these advantages to work.
Start the agent quickstartPrimary sources
Sources checked October 16, 2026
Go deeper